Sarvadaman

We have often heard this from Anti-Hindu squads(Leftists+Ambedkarites especially) that 👇 "Pour molten lead into the ears of the lower caste Shudras, if he intentionally listens for committing to memorize the Vedas." ~ Gautama Dharma Sutra 12.4) Most Hindus unable to answer this and unfortunately trapped into this. Here's the answer:-👇 These are just cherry picked verses to try to make hindus feel guilty. These injunctions fall under the literary category of hyperbole (atishayokti), not meant to be taken literally. For example:- A brahmin who drank alcohol must drink red-hot wine until his body is fully burnt", But no such punishment is prescribed for Shudras. So they're free to enjoy. But Anti-Hindu squads never showed you this things. Let's see from the most famous Brahmanical scripture Manusmriti what it said abou this 👇 Manu Smriti 11.90:-  "A twice-born person(Dvija), having, through folly, drunk wine, shall drink wine red-hot; he becomes freed fr...

Shambuka-vadha is a simple incident which has been twisted to generate greatest confusion about Rāmāyana and Hinduism. Many people do mental gymnastics but don't find an explanation. However, with sincerity and devotion, we can find an explanation in Ramayana itself. Let's look at this incident. Why did Lord Rāma kill Shambūka? What did Shambūka say? Was this killing justified? What words were said exactly by him? Is this story an interpolation ? Let's see.  An aged Brahmana brought the dead body of his very young son to Rāma’s presence and complained that the death of his young boy had happened in Rāma’s kingdom only because of some grievous misconduct on Rāma’s part (7.64.9). After knowing the reason of young boy’s death from his advisors, Rāma went searching for Shambūka (a shūdra) who was doing ugra tapas (सुमहत् तपः) while hanging upside down. Rāma cut off his head and that, as already predicted by Rāma’s advisors, the young boy came back to life (तस्मिन् मुहूर्ते बालो...